There are many positive and negative traits that the two
programs in the film, ‘A Tale of Two Schools’, hold. I personally preferred The
Reading Mastery program used in Fort Worth, Texas. Looking at both of them, I
felt like this program had more positive characteristics. Throughout the film
both schools had struggling students, but I feel that Tavares showed that the
reading Mastery program really worked. The students were very excited in
performing their literacy practices and it showed that this technique actually
helped them progress in their reading skills. The technique the teacher used to
help the students sound out the words seemed like it really worked for them. I
loved the way that the teacher was energetic and also let the students teach
the ‘class’ and others, that way they are more involved in what they are
learning and more excited about it. The only negative aspect in this program I would
say are the resources the teachers are using. I noticed the book that Tavares
was using had no pictures and didn’t seem interesting to him. He was excited to
read because he wanted to show off that he had gained new skills, but I don’t think
he was gaining comprehension for what he was reading or a ‘love’ for reading.
If the teachers provided different books with pictures and a story that
interested him, I feel that he would benefit from this program even more. I
would use these techniques in my classroom one day, but hopefully provide more
resources for my students and help them more with their comprehension skills. I
think the reason why I don’t like the other program as much is because they
struggled with resources as well. They received a grant with more books halfway
through the year, which took away from the efficiency of the program. I feel
like it could have been much better if they had gotten those resources and
provided their teachers with more to structure the program it probably would have
benefitted more students.
Juliana,
ReplyDeleteOne of my critiques for the Reading Mastery program was that the books and materials were not related to the students' lives and interests. Because the program is so scripted and structured the kids did not have a choice in what they read. I agree with you that if they were given the chance to pick their own books, they would develop a love for reading.
Juliana- I too was extremely critical of the Project Read program because of its lack of resources. Receiving the grant and materials in the middle of the year negatively affected the students, teachers, and the program itself. The school was left with very little room to successfully implement the program, which left me skeptical of its overall success. I do agree with you in that with more structure and the necessary resources, this program could be one that benefits a great deal of students.
ReplyDeleteLike yourself and Tara, I did find some of the reading materials for the Reading Mastery program problematic, due to the fact that the children were unable to make personal connections to what they were learning/reading. I would be curious to see if they would progress EVEN MORE if their reading materials were of their personal interests.
Amanda Beideman
Juliana- It was not until reading your blog post that I realized both programs lacked in providing pictures. This also made me realize that there was no comprehension. Children were unable to make personal connections to anything they were reading. They were never given choices or opportunities to express what books THEY would like to read. Who knows, maybe Tavaras would have made more progress if he was able to pick topics of his interest and read them with the teacher. In the end however, he seemed proud of his success!
ReplyDelete